Summary: | [PATCH] document systemd transport in the spec | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | dbus | Reporter: | Lennart Poettering <lennart> |
Component: | core | Assignee: | Rob Taylor <rob.taylor> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.4.x | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | patch missing | ||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Attachments: |
the patch
spec patch Rebased to current git |
Description
Lennart Poettering
2011-03-11 14:59:29 UTC
The patch is on top of the documentation patch in 35230, as a side note. If this is OK to commit and 35230 isn't in by then I can rebase it trivially. Comment on attachment 44373 [details] [review] the patch This documents the exec transport for Bug #35230. Could you attach the patch for systemd: instead, please? :-) OOI, is there any reason not to document the systemd LISTEN_FDS mini-protocol independently of sd itself? It seems like something that any inetd-like setup could use. Created attachment 50555 [details] [review] spec patch Here's the right patch (In reply to comment #3) > OOI, is there any reason not to document the systemd LISTEN_FDS mini-protocol > independently of sd itself? It seems like something that any inetd-like setup > could use. It's already documented here (see Notes): http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/sd_listen_fds.html I have reached out a couple of times to the Upstart folks regarding this, to get them commit to this spec but to no luck. Created attachment 56492 [details] [review] Rebased to current git Applied, thanks. 1.5.10 |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.